In first
person narration, one character tells the whole story. The reader views and
understands everything through one person’s eyes. Note this method used by
debut author, Ladonna Cole, in a fantasy YA, The Torn:
“No, Greg, You did not create them, but
you can
control them. Tell them to go away.”
He grimaced at me and his face
cracked with
grief. I knew he didn’t believe me, yet, I
was
determined to convince him.
Notice the use of the letter “I”, and the word, “we.” The
protagonist, Kate, tells the story. Readers know nothing away from what she
sees, feels, hears, experiences.
I tell the story in my debut YA novel, Victoria and the Ghost, in third person. Notice the difference from
this quote:
back fence and began her work. Squatting
hurt her legs.
When she plopped her hips on the hard
ground and stretched
the kinks from her legs, she heard
rattling. Movement
caught her peripheral vision.
Notice in that excerpt, there’s no “I” or “we.” Instead,
it’s “Victoria” and “she” that tells the events.
Several years ago, an
agent described my third person novel as being in omniscient point-of-view.”
I didn’t understand the criticism until I recently read an article by Mark
Canter in my copy of the RWR magazine (put out by Romance Writers of America).
Canter says third person can be told in two forms, limited
and omniscient. He describes omniscient as the narrator being a “disembodied
witness who hovers over the characters and their actions, telling the reader
exactly what’s going on externally and also inside each character’s heads.” His
definition of limited third person is picking one character at a time and
experiencing the story as if the reader is that character.
Years ago, I took a course called Deep Point-of-View. The teacher used this phrase as a method to put
the reader into the character’s skin, not just hearing about it from the
character.
Two examples:
Calvin watched the man lift a gun and point
it with shaky fingers at Calvin. Fear swept over him. He halted wondering if he
could overpower his enemy in time to live.
Calvin’s heart
bounced with each bob of the gun. He took one step, two …. Sweat trickled down
his temple. Click. The next sound would be a bang, but by then, he would be
dead. His legs froze.
Which example puts you better into the character’s skin?
That’s
deep POV.
Try writing your own examples, both hearing it through the
POV character and then living it with the POV character. Feel the difference.
Write like you’re experiencing it in real time.
Two more examples to help you get started:
Renee awoke and
looked around her. A bright light was shining in her face. The wall was a stark
white, but she saw colors moving around her bed. Her arm was restrained by an
IV. She wondered if she was still in Hawaii .
Renee awoke and
squinted against the bright light. A kaleidoscope of colors swirled against a
stark white wall. An IV restrained one arm.
Was she still in Hawaii ?
Both examples give
the same information. The first gives the story through Renee’s eyes. In
comparison, though the second one gives it through Renee’s point of view, too, the
reader lives it with her.
Deep POV uses more
active verbs, less passive.
Deep POV doesn’t
use filtering words such as she saw or she looked.
Deep POV shows,
doesn’t just tell.
Deep POV makes you feel
it along with the character.
In Deep POV, the writing is tighter.
What about you?
Do you write
omniscient third person or limited third person, better known as deep POV?
Other helpful sites on this topic are:
When I reading limited third person or first person I realized how much I preferred deep point of view to third person omniscient. I never write in the latter.
ReplyDeleteMe, neither, Cheryl. Strange how I used to think it was good. Fortunately, we do learn.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Janet. Your examples point out the subtle differences. I find that my first drafts, unfortunately, tend to lean omniscient. II focus on putting the reader into the character's shoes during the revision phase. Helpful post!
ReplyDeleteI so agree, Suzanne. Omniscient POV does show up in 1st drafts. The best way is to remember to live as you write it. Don't you just love getting that absorbed in the story.
ReplyDeleteI've been learning DPOV for the last three years. Right now I am revising romances I wrote in the 1990s to incorporate DPOV and do away with head-hopping. It's a real challenge, but readers today dislike head-hopping and expect a more compelling experience. So DPOV is what I aim for, but it's a struggle at times.
ReplyDeleteDonna Winters
It is a struggle, Donna, but the reader really gets into the book better. Good luck on your rewrites.
ReplyDelete